THE
(Act XII of 2006)
C
O N T E N T S
Section Heading
1. Short title, extent, commencement and
application.
2. Definitions.
3. Grounds
for proceedings and penalty.
4. Penalties.
5. Initiation of proceedings.
6. Suspension.
7. Procedure where inquiry is dispensed
with.
8. Action in case of conviction or plea
bargain under any law.
9. Procedure to be followed by competent
authority where inquiry is necessary.
10. Procedure to be followed by inquiry
officer or inquiry committee.
11. Powers of the inquiry officer or
inquiry committee.
12. Duties of the departmental
representative.
13. Order to be passed by the competent
authority on receipt of report from the inquiry officer or inquiry committee.
14. Personal hearing.
15. Procedure
of inquiry against officers lent to other governments, etc.
16. Departmental
appeal and review.
17. Revision
18. Appearance
of counsel.
19. Appeal
before the Service Tribunal.
20. Act
to override other laws.
21. Proceedings
under this Act.
22. Indemnity.
23. Jurisdiction
barred.
24. Power
to make rules.
25. Removal
of difficulties.
26. Repeal.
[1]THE
(Act XII of 2006)
[17 October 2006]
An Act to
provide for proceedings against the employees in
government and corporation
service in relation to their
efficiency, discipline and
accountability.
Preamble.– Whereas it is
expedient and necessary in the public interest and for good governance to
provide measures for improvement of efficiency, discipline and accountability
of employees in government and corporation service and matters connected
therewith or ancillary thereto;
It is hereby
enacted as follows:-
1. Short title, extent, commencement and application.– (1) This Act may be called the Punjab
Employees Efficiency, Discipline and Accountability Act 2006.
(2) It
extends to the whole of the
(3) It
shall come into force at once.
(4) It
shall apply to–
(i) employees in
government service;
(ii) employees in corporation service; and
(iii) retired employees of
government and corporation service; provided that proceedings under this Act
are initiated against them during their service or within one year of their
retirement.
2. Definitions.– In this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the
subject or context–
(a) “accused” means a person who is or has been an employee and
against whom action is initiated under this Act;
(b) “appellate authority” means the authority next above the
competent authority to which an appeal lies against the orders of the competent
authority;
(c) “appointing authority” in relation to an
employee or class of employees means an appointing authority declared or
notified as such by an order of the Government or organization or under the
rules, etc., as may be applicable to such employee or class of employees;
(d) “charge” means
allegations framed against the accused pertaining to acts of omission or
commission cognizable under this Act;
(e) “Chief
Minister” means the Chief Minister of the
(f) “competent authority” means–
(i) the Chief Minister;
or
(ii) in relation to any employee or class of
employees, any officer or authority authorized by the Chief Minister to
exercise the powers of competent authority under this Act; provided that such
officer or authority shall not be inferior in rank to the appointing authority
prescribed for the post held by the employee against whom action is to be
taken; or
(iii) in relation to an employee of a tribunal
or court functioning under the Government, the appointing authority or the
chairman or presiding officer of such tribunal or court, as the case may be,
authorized by the appointing authority to exercise the powers of competent
authority under this Act:
Provided that
where two or more employees are to be proceeded against jointly, the competent
authority in relation to senior most employee in rank shall be the competent
authority in respect of all the accused:
Provided further
that where the competent authority, other than the Chief Minister, has any
interest in the result of proceedings under this Act, and does not desire to
act as competent authority due to personal reasons, he shall not proceed with
the case and shall report the matter to the next higher authority who shall
authorize another officer of the corresponding rank and status to act as the
competent authority in a specific case;
(g) “corruption” means–
(i) accepting or
obtaining or offering any gratification or valuable thing, directly or
indirectly, other than legal remuneration, as a reward for doing or for bearing
to do any official act; or
(ii) dishonestly or fraudulently
misappropriating, or indulging in embezzlement or misusing Government property
or resources; or
(iii) possession of
pecuniary sources or property by an employee or any of his dependents or any
other person, through him or on his behalf, which cannot be accounted for and
which are disproportionate to his known sources of income; or
(iv) maintaining standard of living beyond
known sources of income; or
(v) having a reputation of being corrupt; or
(vi) entering into plea bargain under any law
for the time being in force and return the assets or gains acquired through
corruption or corrupt practices, voluntarily;
(h) “employee” means a person–
(i) in the employment of a corporation, corporate
body, autonomous body, authority, statutory body or any other organization or
institution set up, established, owned, managed or controlled by the
Government, by or under any law for the time being in force or a body or
organization in which the Government has a controlling share or interest and
includes the chairman and the chief executive, and the holder of any other
office therein; and
[2][(ii) in Government
service or who is a member of a civil service of the province or who holds a
civil post in connection with the affairs of the province or any employee
serving in any court or tribunal set up or established by the Government but
does not include–
(aa) a Judge of the Lahore High Court or any court
subordinate to that Court or an employee of such courts; and
(bb) an employee of Police.]
(i) “Government” means the Government of the
(j) “hearing
officer” means an officer, senior in rank to the accused, appointed by any
authority competent to appoint hearing officer, to afford an opportunity of
personal hearing to the accused on behalf of the authority concerned;
(k) “inefficiency” means failure to–
(i) efficiently perform
functions assigned to an employee in the discharge of his duties; or
(ii) qualify departmental examination in three
consecutive attempts;
(l) “inquiry committee” means a committee of two or more
officers, headed by a convener, as may be appointed by the competent authority
under this Act;
(m) “inquiry officer” means an officer appointed by the competent
authority under this Act;
(n) “misconduct” includes–
(i) conduct prejudicial
to good order or service discipline; or
(ii) conduct contrary to the conduct rules,
for the time being in force; or
(iii) conduct unbecoming of an officer and a
gentleman; or
(iv) involvement or participation for gain directly or indirectly, in
industry, trade or speculative transactions by abuse or misuse of
official position to gain undue advantage or assumption of such financial or
other obligations in relation to private institutions or persons, as may
compromise the performance of official duties or functions; or
(v) any act to bring or attempt to bring outside influence directly or
indirectly to bear on the Governor, the Chief Minister, a Minister, or any
other authority in respect of any matter relating to the appointment,
promotion, transfer, punishment, retirement or other conditions of service; or
(vi) making appointment or promotion or having
been appointed or promoted on extraneous grounds in violation of any law
or rules; or
(vii) absence from duty without prior approval of leave; or
(viii) acquittal by a court
of law as a result of compounding of an offence involving moral turpitude or
affecting human body; or
(ix) conviction for an offence by a court of
law;
(o) “prescribed” means prescribed by rules made under this Act;
and
(p) “section” means section of this Act.
3. Grounds
for proceedings and penalty.– An employee shall be
liable to be proceeded against under this Act, if he is–
(i) inefficient or has
ceased to be efficient for any reason; or
(ii) guilty of misconduct; or
(iii) guilty of corruption or is reasonably considered to be
corrupt; or
(iv) engaged
or is reasonably believed to be engaged in subversive activities, and his
retention in service is prejudicial to national security, or is guilty of
disclosure of official secrets to any unauthorized person.
4. Penalties.– (1) The competent authority may, notwithstanding
anything contained in any law or the terms and conditions of service of the
accused, by an order in writing, impose one or more of the following penalties,
namely:-
(a) Minor
penalties–
(i) censure;
(ii) withholding of increment or increments,
for a specific period, subject to a maximum of five years;
(iii) fine not exceeding basic pay of one month;
(iv) reduction to a lower stage or stages in
pay scale, subject to a maximum of five stages [3][for a specific
period]; and
(v) withholding of promotion for a specific period, subject to a
maximum of five years; provided that this period shall be counted from the date
when a person junior to the accused is considered for promotion and is promoted
on regular basis for the first time;
(b) Major
penalties–
(i) recovery from
pay, pension or any other amount payable to the accused, the whole or a part of
any pecuniary loss caused to the Government or the organization in which he was
employed, and if the amount due from any such person cannot be wholly recovered
from the pay, pension or any other amount payable to him, such amount shall be
recovered under the law for the time being in force;
(ii) reduction to a lower post and pay scale from the substantive or
regular post for a specific period subject to a maximum of five years;
(iii) forfeiture of past service for a specific
period subject to a maximum of five years;
(iv) compulsory retirement;
(v) removal from service; and
(vi) dismissal from service; and
(c) Penalties
after retirement–
(i) withholding of
pension or any part thereof [4][for
a specific period keeping in view the loss caused to the Government];
(ii) withdrawing of pension or any part thereof
[5][for
a specific period keeping in view the loss caused to Government]; and
(iii) recovery from pension or any other amount payable to the accused,
of pecuniary loss caused to the Government or the organization in which he was
employed, and if the amount due from any such person cannot be wholly recovered
from the pension or any other amount payable to him, such amount shall be
recovered under the law for the time being in force.
(2) Dismissal
from service under this Act shall disqualify the employee for future employment
under the Government or under any organization to which the provisions of this
Act apply.
(3) Any penalty
under this Act shall not absolve an employee or accused from liability to any
punishment to which he may be liable for an offence, under any law, committed
by him while in service.
5. Initiation
of proceedings.– (1) If on the basis of its own knowledge or information
placed before it, the competent authority is of the opinion that there are
sufficient grounds for initiating proceedings against an employee under this
Act, it shall either–
(a) proceed itself
against the accused by issuing a show cause notice under section 7 and, for
reasons to be recorded in writing, dispense with the inquiry:
Provided that no opportunity
of showing cause or personal hearing shall be given where–
(i) the competent authority is satisfied that in
the interest of security of Pakistan or any part thereof, it is not expedient
to give such an opportunity; or
(ii) an employee has
entered into plea bargain under any law for the time being in force or has been
convicted of the charges of corruption which have led to a sentence of fine or
imprisonment; or
(iii) an employee is
involved in subversive activities; or
(iv) it is not reasonably practicable to give
such an opportunity to the accused; or
(b) get an inquiry conducted into the charge or charges against
the accused, by appointing an inquiry officer or an inquiry committee, as the
case may be, under section 10:
Provided that the competent
authority shall dispense with the inquiry where–
(i) an
employee has been convicted of any offence other than corruption by a court of
law under any law for the time being in force; or
(ii) an employee is or has
been absent from duty without prior approval of leave:
Provided further that the
competent authority may dispense with the inquiry where it is in possession of
sufficient documentary evidence against the accused or, for reasons to be
recorded in writing, he is satisfied that there is no need to hold an inquiry.
(2) The
orders of inquiry or the show cause notice, as the case may be, shall be signed
by the competent authority; provided that where the Chief Minister is the
competent authority, the same
shall be signed by such officer as may be authorized by him in this behalf.
6. Suspension.– An employee against
whom action is proposed to be initiated under section 5 may be placed under
suspension for a period of ninety days, if in the opinion of the competent
authority, suspension is necessary or expedient, and if the period of
suspension is not extended for a further period of ninety days within thirty
days of the expiry of initial period of suspension, the employee shall be
deemed to be reinstated:
Provided that the
continuation of the period of suspension shall require the prior approval of
the competent authority for each period of extension.
7. Procedure where inquiry is dispensed with.– If the competent authority decides that it is not
necessary to hold an inquiry against the accused under section 5, it shall–
(a) inform the accused by an order in writing, of
the grounds for proceeding against him, clearly specifying the charges therein,
along with apportionment of responsibility and the penalty or penalties
proposed to be imposed upon him;
(b) give him a reasonable
opportunity of showing cause against the proposed action, within seven days of
receipt of the order or within such extended period as the competent authority
may determine;
(c) on receipt of reply of the accused within the stipulated
period or after the expiry thereof, if no reply is received, determine whether
the charge or charges have been proved against the accused or not:
Provided that after receipt of reply to
the show cause notice from the accused, the competent authority, except where
the Chief Minister himself is the competent authority, shall decide the case
within a period of ninety days, excluding the time during which the post held
by the competent authority remained vacant due to certain reasons:
Provided further that if the case is not decided by the competent
authority within the prescribed period of ninety days, the accused may file an application
before the appellate authority for early decision of his case, which may direct
the competent authority to decide the case within a specified period.
(d) afford
an opportunity of personal hearing either itself or through the hearing
officer, before passing any order of penalty under clause (f), if it is
determined that the charge or charges have been proved against him; provided
that the hearing officer shall only be appointed where the competent authority
is of the rank of Secretary to Government of the Punjab or above; and
(e) exonerate the accused, by an order in writing, if it is determined that the charge or
charges have not been proved against him; and
(f) impose
any one or more penalties mentioned in section 4, by an order in writing, if
the charge or charges are proved against the accused:
Provided that–
(i) where charge or
charges of grave corruption are proved against an accused, the penalty of
dismissal from service shall be imposed, in addition to the penalty of
recovery, if any; and
(ii) where charge of
absence from duty for a period of more than one year is proved against the
accused, the penalty of compulsory retirement or removal or dismissal from
service shall be imposed upon the accused.
8. Action in case of conviction or plea
bargain under any law.– Where an employee is
convicted by a court of law or has entered into plea bargain or has been
acquitted by a court of law as a result of compounding of an offence involving
moral turpitude or affecting human body under any law for the time being in
force, the competent authority, after examining facts of the case, shall–
(a) dismiss
the employee, where he has been convicted of charges of corruption or has
entered into plea bargain and has returned the assets or gains acquired through
corruption or corrupt practices voluntarily; or
(b) proceed against the employee under section 7, where he has
been convicted of charges other than corruption; or
(c) proceed against the employee under section 9, where he has
been acquitted by a court of law as a result of compounding of an offence
involving moral turpitude or affecting human body.
9. Procedure to be followed by competent
authority where inquiry is necessary.– (1) If the competent authority decides that it is necessary to hold an
inquiry against the accused under section 5, it shall pass an order of inquiry
in writing, which shall include–
(a) appointment of an inquiry officer or an
inquiry committee; provided that the inquiry officer or the convener of inquiry
committee, as the case may be, shall be of a rank senior to the accused and
where two or more accused are proceeded against jointly, the inquiry officer or
the convener of the inquiry committee shall be of a rank senior to the senior
most accused;
(b) the grounds for proceeding, clearly specifying the charges
along with apportionment of responsibility;
(c) appointment of the departmental representative by
designation; and
(d) direction to the accused to submit written defence to the inquiry officer or the inquiry committee, as
the case may be, within seven days of the date of receipt of orders or within
such extended period as the competent authority may determine.
(2) The
record of the case and the list of witnesses, if any, shall be communicated to
the inquiry officer or the inquiry committee, as the case may be, along with
the orders of inquiry.
10. Procedure to be followed by inquiry officer
or inquiry committee.–
(1) On receipt of reply of the accused or on expiry of the stipulated period if
no reply is received from the accused, the inquiry officer or the inquiry
committee, as the case may be, shall inquire into the charges and may examine
such oral or documentary evidence in support of the charge or in defence of the
accused as may be considered necessary and where any witness is produced by one
party, the other party shall be entitled to cross examine such witness.
(2) If
the accused fails to furnish his reply within the stipulated period, or
extended period, if any, the inquiry officer or the inquiry committee, as the
case may be, shall proceed with the inquiry ex parte.
(3) The
inquiry officer or the inquiry committee, as the case may be, shall hear the
case from day to day and no adjournment shall be given except for reasons to be
recorded in writing, in which case it shall not be of more than seven days.
(4) Where the inquiry officer or the inquiry
committee, as the case may be, is satisfied that the accused is hampering or
attempting to hamper the progress of the inquiry, he or it shall administer a
warning and if, thereafter, he or it is satisfied that the accused is acting in
disregard to the warning, he or it shall record a finding to that effect and
proceed to complete the inquiry in such manner as may be deemed expedient in
the interest of justice.
(5) If
the accused absents himself from the inquiry on medical grounds, he shall be
deemed to have hampered or attempted to hamper the progress of the inquiry,
unless medical leave, applied for by him, is sanctioned on the recommendation
of a Medical Board; provided that the competent authority may, in its
discretion, sanction medical leave up to seven days without recommendation of
the Medical Board.
(6) The
inquiry officer or the inquiry committee, as the case may be, shall submit his
or its report, containing clear findings as to whether the charge or charges
have been proved or not and specific recommendations regarding exoneration or,
imposition of penalty or penalties, to the competent authority within sixty
days of the initiation of inquiry:
Provided that where the inquiry cannot be
completed within sixty days, the inquiry officer or the inquiry committee, as
the case may be, shall seek extension for specific period from the competent
authority, for reasons to be recorded in writing:
Provided further that the inquiry shall not be vitiated merely on
the grounds of non-observance of the time schedule for completion of inquiry:
Provided further that the recommendations of the inquiry officer or
the inquiry committee, as the case may be, shall not be binding on the
competent authority.
11. Powers
of the inquiry officer or inquiry committee.– (1) For the purpose of an
inquiry under this Act, the inquiry officer and the inquiry committee shall
have the powers of a Civil Court trying a suit under the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908 (Act V of 1908), in respect of the following:-
(a) summoning and enforcing the attendance of any person and
examining him on oath;
(b) requiring the discovery and production of documents, and
receiving evidence on affidavits; and
(c) issuing commissions for the examination of
witnesses or documents.
(2) The
proceedings under this Act shall be deemed to be judicial proceedings within
the meaning of sections 193 and 228 of the Pakistan Penal Code, 1860 (Act XLV
of 1860).
12. Duties of the departmental representative.– The departmental representative shall perform the
following duties, namely–
(a) render full assistance to the inquiry officer
or the inquiry committee or hearing
officer or the authority concerned,
as the case may be, during the proceedings where he shall be personally
present and fully prepared with all the relevant record relating to the case,
on each date of hearing;
(b) cross-examine the
witnesses produced by the accused and with permission of the inquiry officer or
inquiry committee, as the case may be, the prosecution witnesses in case of
their turning hostile; and
(c) rebut the grounds of
defence offered by the accused before the hearing officer or the authority
concerned.
13. Order to be passed by the competent authority
on receipt of report from the inquiry officer or inquiry committee.– (1) On receipt of the
report from the inquiry officer or inquiry committee, as the case may be, the
competent authority shall examine the report and the relevant case material and
determine whether the inquiry has been conducted in accordance with the
provisions of this Act.
(2) If
the competent authority is satisfied that the inquiry has been conducted in
accordance with the provisions of this Act, it shall further determine whether
the charge or charges have been proved against the accused or not.
(3) Where
the charge or charges have not been proved, the competent authority shall
exonerate the accused by an order in writing.
(4) Where the charge or charges have been
proved against the accused, the competent authority shall issue a show cause
notice to the accused by which it shall–
(a) inform him of the charges proved against him and the penalty
or penalties proposed to be imposed upon him by the inquiry officer or inquiry committee;
(b) give him reasonable opportunity of showing
cause against the penalty or penalties proposed to be imposed upon him and to
submit as to why one or more of the
penalties as provided in section 4 may not be imposed upon him and to
submit additional defence in writing, if any, within
seven days of the receipt of the notice, before itself or the hearing officer,
as the case may be;
(c) indicate the date of
personal hearing or appoint a hearing officer to afford an opportunity of
personal hearing on his behalf; provided
that the hearing officer shall only be appointed where the competent authority
is of the rank of Secretary to the Government of the
(d) provide a copy of the inquiry report to the accused; and
(e) direct the departmental representative to appear, with all
the relevant record, on the date of hearing before himself or the hearing
officer, as the case may be.
(5) After
affording personal hearing to the accused or on receipt of the report of the
hearing officer, the competent authority shall, keeping in view the findings
and recommendations of the inquiry officer or inquiry committee, as the case
may be, facts of the case and defence offered by the accused during personal
hearing, by an order in writing–
(i) exonerate the accused; or
(ii) impose any one or
more of the penalties specified in section 4:
Provided that–
(i) where charge or charges of grave corruption
are proved against an accused, the penalty of dismissal from service shall be
imposed, in addition to the penalty of recovery, if any; and
(ii) where charge of
absence from duty for a period of more than one year is proved against the
accused, the penalty of compulsory retirement or removal or dismissal from
service shall be imposed upon the accused.
(6) Where
the competent authority is satisfied that the inquiry proceedings have not been
conducted in accordance with the provisions of this Act or the facts and merits
of the case have been ignored or there are other sufficient grounds, it may,
after recording reasons in writing, either remand the inquiry to the inquiry
officer or the inquiry committee, as the case may be, with such directions as
the competent authority may like to give, or may order a de novo
inquiry.
(7) After receipt of inquiry report, the competent authority, except
where the Chief Minister himself is the competent authority, shall decide the
case within a period of [6][sixty days],
excluding the time during which the post held by the competent authority
remained vacant due to certain reasons.
[7][(7a) The Cabinet Committee on Legislation may
allow further time if it is satisfied that the competent authority could not
decide the case within sixty days for reasons beyond its control.]
(8) If the case is not decided by the competent authority within the
prescribed period of [8][sixty days],
the accused may file an application before the appellate authority for early
decision of his case, which may direct the competent authority to decide the
case within a specified period.
14. Personal hearing.– (1) The authority affording
personal hearing or the hearing officer on receiving an order of his
appointment shall, by an order in writing, call the accused and the
departmental representative, along with relevant record of the case, to appear
before him for personal hearing on the fixed date and time.
(2) After
affording personal hearing to the accused, the authority or the hearing officer
shall, in relation to the case and the contention of the accused during the
hearing, record his remarks in writing and, in case of hearing officer, submit a report to
the authority so appointed him which shall include–
(i) summary of the inquiry report where inquiry was conducted under
section 10, or summary of the defence offered by the accused to the show cause notice under section 7, or
grounds of appeal or review filed under section 16, as the case may be;
(ii) summary of defence
offered by the accused during the hearing, if any; and
(iii) views of the
departmental representative, if any.
15. Procedure of inquiry against officers lent to
other governments, etc.–
(1) Where the services of an employee are transferred or lent to any other
government, department, corporation, corporate body, autonomous body,
authority, statutory body or any other organization or institution, hereinafter
referred to as the borrowing organization, the competent authority for the post
against which such employee is posted in the borrowing organization may–
(a) suspend him under section 6; and
(b) initiate proceedings against him under this Act:
Provided
that the borrowing organization shall forthwith inform the lending organization
of the circumstances leading to the order of his suspension and the
commencement of the proceedings:
Provided
further that the borrowing organization shall obtain prior approval of the
lending organization before taking any action under this Act, against an
employee holding a post in Basic Pay Scale 17 or above.
(2) If,
in the light of the findings of the proceedings taken against the accused in
terms of sub-section (1), the borrowing organization is of the opinion that any
penalty may have to be imposed on him, it shall transmit the record of the
proceedings to the lending organization, and the competent authority in the
lending organization shall thereupon take action against the accused under
section 13.
(3) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary
contained in sub-sections (1) and (2), the Chief Minister may, in respect of
certain employees or class of employees, authorize any officer or authority in
the borrowing organization to exercise all the powers of competent authority
under this Act.
16. Departmental
appeal and review.– (1) An accused who has been awarded any penalty under
this Act may, except where the penalty has been imposed by the Chief Minister,
within thirty days from the date of communication of the order, prefer
departmental appeal directly to the appellate authority:
Provided that where the order has been
passed by the Chief Minister, the accused may, within the aforesaid period,
submit a review petition directly to the Chief Minister.
(2) The
authority empowered under sub-section (1) shall call for the record of the case
and comments on the points raised in the appeal from the concerned department
or office, and on consideration of the appeal or the review petition, as the
case may be, by an order in writing–
(a) uphold the order of penalty and reject the appeal or review
petition; or
(b) set aside the orders and exonerate the accused; or
(c) modify the orders and reduce or enhance the penalty; or
(d) set
aside the order of penalty and remand the case to the competent authority,
where it is satisfied that the proceedings by the competent authority or the
inquiry officer or inquiry committee, as the case may be, have not been conducted
in accordance with the provisions of this Act, or the facts and merits of the
case have been ignored, with the directions to either hold a de novo
inquiry or to rectify the procedural lapses or irregularities in the
proceedings:
Provided that where the
appellate or review authority proposes to enhance the penalty, it shall by an
order in writing–
(i) inform the accused of the action proposed to be taken
against him and the grounds of such action; and
(ii) give him a reasonable opportunity to show cause
against the action and afford him an opportunity of personal hearing either
itself or through a hearing officer; provided that the hearing officer shall
only be appointed where the appellate or the review authority is of the rank of
Secretary to the Government of the Punjab or above.
(3) An
appeal or review preferred under this section shall be made in the form of a
petition, in writing, and shall set forth concisely the grounds of objection to
the impugned order in a proper and temperate language.
17. Revision.– (1) The Chief Minister, Chief Secretary or the Administrative Secretary or any other
appellate authority may call
for the record of any proceedings within one year of the order of exoneration
or imposition of a penalty, passed by the competent authority or the order of
appellate authority, as the case may be, for the purpose of satisfying himself
as to the correctness, legality or
propriety of such proceedings or order.
(2) On
examining the record of the case, such authority may–
(i) uphold the orders of the competent authority or the
appellate authority, as the case may be; or
(ii) order the competent
authority to hold de novo inquiry; or
(iii) impose or enhance a
penalty or penalties:
Provided
that no order, prejudicial to the accused, shall be passed under this section
unless the accused has been given a reasonable opportunity of showing cause
against the proposed action and an opportunity of personal hearing.
18. Appearance of counsel.–
The accused, at no stage of the proceedings under this Act, except proceedings
under section 19, shall be represented by an advocate.
[9][19. Appeal before the Service Tribunal.– (1) An employee, other than the employee mentioned
in section 2(h)(i), aggrieved by a final order passed
under section 16 or 17 may, within thirty days from the date of communication
of the order, prefer an appeal to the Punjab Service Tribunal established under
the Punjab Service Tribunals Act 1974 (IX of 1974).
(2) If the Appellate
Authority or the Chief Minister does not pass any final order on the
departmental appeal or the review petition filed under section 16 within a
period of sixty days from the date of filing of the departmental appeal or the
review petition, the aggrieved employee, not being the employee mentioned in section
2(h)(i), may prefer an
appeal to the Punjab Service Tribunal within ninety days of the filing of the
departmental appeal or review petition.
(3) On the exercise of the option in terms of
subsection (2), the appeal or, as the case may be, the review pending before
the Appellate Authority or the Chief Minister shall abate to the extent of such
employee.]
[10][Explanation: The word “employee”,
in this section, shall include a former employee.]
20. Act to override other laws.– The provisions of this Act shall have effect
notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in any other law for the
time being in force.
21. Proceedings under this Act.– Subject to this Act, all proceedings initiated against
the employees having retired or in service, shall be governed by the provisions
of this Act and the rules made thereunder:
Provided that in case of
retired employee, the proceedings so initiated against him shall be finalized
not later than two years of his retirement.
(2) The
competent authority may, by an order in writing, impose one or more penalties
specified in clause (c) of section 4, if the charge or charges are proved
against the retired employee.
22. Indemnity.– No
suit, prosecution or other legal proceedings shall lie against the competent
authority or any other authority for anything done or intended to be done in
good faith under this Act or the rules, instructions or directions made or
issued thereunder.
23. Jurisdiction barred.–
Save as provided under this Act, no order made or proceedings taken under this
Act, or the rules made thereunder, shall be called in question in any court and
no injunction shall be granted by any court in respect of any decision so made
or proceedings taken in pursuance of any power conferred by, or under this Act,
or the rules made thereunder.
24. Power to make rules.–
The Government may, by notification in the official Gazette, make rules for
carrying out the purposes of this Act.
25. Removal of difficulties.– If any difficulty arises in giving effect to any of the
provisions of this Act, the Chief Minister may make such order, not
inconsistent with the provisions of this Act, as may appear to him to be
necessary for the purpose of removing that difficulty.
26. Repeal.– (1) The Punjab
Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000 (Ord. IV of 2000), is
hereby repealed.
(2) Notwithstanding the repeal of the Punjab
Removal from Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000 (Ord. IV of 2000), all
proceedings pending immediately before the commencement of this Act against any
employee under the said repealed Ordinance or under the Punjab Civil Servants
Act, 1974 (Pb. Act VIII of 1974), and the rules made
thereunder, or any other law or rules shall continue under that law and rules,
in the manner provided thereunder.
[1]
This Act was passed by the Punjab Assembly on 2 October
2006; assented to by the Governor of the
[2]
Substituted by the
[3]
Inserted by the
[4]
Inserted by the
[5]
Inserted by the
[6] Substituted for the words “ninety days” by the Punjab Employees Efficiency, Discipline and Accountability (Amendment) Act 2017 (XXV of 2017).
[7]
Inserted by the
[8] Substituted for the words “ninety days” by the Punjab Employees Efficiency, Discipline and Accountability (Amendment) Act 2017 (XXV of 2017).
[9]Substituted by the Punjab Employees Efficiency, Discipline and
Accountability (Amendment) Act 2014 (XV of
2014) for the following Section 19:-
“19. Appeal before Punjab Service Tribunal.– (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for
the time being in force, any employee aggrieved by any final order passed under
section 16 or section 17 may, within thirty days from the date of communication
of the order, prefer an appeal to the Punjab Service Tribunal established under
the Punjab Service Tribunals Act, 1974 (Pb. Act, IX
of 1974).
(2) If a decision on a departmental appeal or review petition, as the case may be, filed under section 16 is not received within a period of sixty days of filing thereof, the affected employee may file an appeal in the Punjab Service Tribunal within a period of thirty days of the expiry of the aforesaid period, whereafter, the authority with whom the departmental appeal or review is pending, shall not take any further action.”
[10]
Inserted by the